|
Although it was previously believed that
most children with ADHD would "outgrow"
the disorder by adolescence, several longitudinal
studies have provided clear evidence that
ADHD often persists into adolescence and
adulthood. Prior research has also established
that childhood ADHD is associated with a
number of negative outcomes during adolescence,
with school-related difficulties being especially
prominent.
A particular concern of many parents and
professionals is the extent to which childhood
ADHD is a risk factor for substance use
during adolescence. Some researchers have
reported higher rates of cigarette use for
individuals previously diagnosed with ADHD,
but not higher rates of alcohol use or other
drugs. Others have reported higher rates
of drug use but not alcohol use, while still
others have not found any elevated substance
use among adolescents previously diagnosed
with ADHD.
There are several possible explanations
for these discrepant findings. First, prior
studies of this issue did not always include
comprehensive assessments of adolescent
substance use. Second, because many adolescents
experiment with different substances it
is important to examine the frequency and
quantity of use, including heavy use, rather
than whether or not any substance use has
occurred. Finally, age of first substance
use is a well-established predictor of later
problematic use, and this variable has often
not been sufficiently included in prior
studies.
Another unresolved issue is the extent
to which childhood ADHD symptoms per se,
as opposed to the conduct problems that
often accompany ADHD, are most directly
associated with the development of substance
use problems. Some studies suggest that
childhood aggression and other Conduct Disorder
symptoms predict substance use in adolescence,
while core ADHD symptoms - i.e., inattention
and hyperactivity-impulsivity - do not.
A limitation of these prior studies is
that they vary in the adequacy with which
childhood ADHD and Conduct Disorder were
assessed, and they did not separately consider
the contribution of attention problems and
hyperactivity-impulsivity to later substance
use. These two groups of symptoms are associated
with different difficulties, however (e.g.,
inattention is reliably associated with
academic difficulties while hyperactivity-impulsivity
is more closely linked to behavior problems),
and the failure to consider these dimensions
separately may have obscured associations
between ADHD symptoms in childhood and substance
use during adolescence.
A study published in an issue of the Journal
of Abnormal Psychology [Molina & Pelham
(2003). Childhood predictors of adolescent
substance use in a longitudinal study of
children with ADHD, 112, 497-507] provides
new data that clarifies several of these
prior inconsistencies. Participants were
142 adolescents with childhood ADHD and
100 demographically similar adolescents
without childhood ADHD. Participants with
ADHD had been diagnosed between the ages
of 5 and 12 and received services at that
time, although information on the nature
and extent of treatment services received
is not provided. Comparison children without
ADHD were recruited at that time from similar
neighborhoods.
When participants reached adolescence,
their parents were re-contacted to participate
in the study. At this time, participants
with and without ADHD were given an extensive
interview pertaining to their history of
substance use. In addition, adolescents
and parents were interviewed to assess the
extent of current ADHD symptoms as well
as any co-occurring psychiatric difficulties.
An average of 5.26 years had elapsed between
the childhood diagnosis of ADHD and this
assessment during adolescence.
RESULTS
LIFETIME DIFFERENCES IN SUBSTANCE USE
The authors first examined lifetime differences
in use of any substances between the two
groups. Compared to adolescents without
a childhood diagnosis of ADHD, those with
a childhood diagnosis were not significantly
more likely to have used alcohol, cigarettes,
or marijuana. They were, however, more then
3 times as likely to have used at least
one illicit drug beside marijuana - i.e.
20.4% of adolescents with childhood ADHD
reported this compared to only 7% of comparison
subjects. Although this is concerning, it
is important to note that nearly 80% of
the adolescents with childhood ADHD did
not report illicit drug use.
DIFFERENCES IN LEVEL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND
AGE OF SUBSTANCE USE ONSET
In addition to lifetime substance use history,
the researchers considered group differences
in the level of substance use. Adolescents
with a childhood history of ADHD were:
•
about 3 times more likely to be a daily
smoker (30.4% vs. 12%);
•
had consumed more cigarettes in the past
6 months;were about twice as likely to have
been drunk multiple times during the
6 months (23.2% vs. 12%); and,
•
had higher rates of alcohol problems overall
(15.5% vs. 85).
On average, adolescents with ADHD began
smoking about 13 months earlier than other
adolescents and used their first illicit
drug about 7 months earlier. These differences
are important because earlier onset of substance
use is associated with higher rates of subsequent
substance use problems.
PREDICTORS OF SUBSTANCE USE IN ADOLESCENTS
WITH CHILDHOOD ADHD
Next, the authors examined predictors of
substance use among adolescents with childhood
ADHD. Predictor variables included the severity
of inattentive symptoms during childhood,
the severity of hyperactive-impulsive symptoms
during childhood, and the severity of other
behavior problems (i.e. oppositional defiant
disorder symptoms and conduct disorder symptoms)
during childhood. A variety of substance
use outcomes were considered including those
pertaining to cigarette use, alcohol use,
marijuana use, and use of other illicit
drugs.
In general, inattentive symptoms were a
consistent predictor of different adolescent
substance use outcomes while hyperactive-impulsive
symptoms and ODD-CD symptoms were not.
The main exception to this pertained to
illicit drug use (i.e. the use of drugs
besides marijuana) where childhood ODD/CD
symptoms were significant predictors but
childhood inattention symptoms were not.
THE IMPACT OF PERSISTENT ADHD ON ADOLESCENT
SUBSTANCE USE
Finally, the authors considered
whether the persistence of ADHD into adolescence,
and the co-occurrence during adolescence
of ADHD and Conduct Disorder, was associated
with adolescent substance use. Interestingly,
72% of adolescents who had been diagnosed
with ADHD during childhood continued to
meet diagnostic criteria for ADHD at follow-up,
and about 1/3 of these adolescents also
had a diagnosis of Conduct Disorder.
Compared to adolescents without persistent
ADHD those with persistent ADHD were more
than twice as likely to be smokers. Rates
of other substance use problems, however,
were roughly comparable. For adolescents
without persistent ADHD, substance use patterns
were not different from those of adolescents
never diagnosed with ADHD.
Adolescents with persistent ADHD who had
also developed Conduct Disorder had the
highest rates of substance use problems
of any group, including adolescents with
persistent ADHD but who had not developed
Conduct Disorder.
SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS
Results from this study provide
clear evidence that childhood ADHD is associated
with increased risk of use and abuse of
alcohol and with earlier and heavier use
of tobacco and other drugs in the teenage
years. Of particular interest is the finding
that inattentive symptoms more strongly
predict adolescent substance than hyperactive-impulsive
symptoms or childhood antisocial behavior.
The only exception to this was that childhood
antisocial behavior was a stronger predictor
of non-marijuana illicit drug use.
Although inattentive ADHD symptoms were
a key predictor of adolescent substance
use, it is important to note that substance
use problems were strongest among adolescents
who had also developed Conduct Disorder.
Thus, the combination of high levels of
inattentive symptoms and the development
of serious antisocial behavior is a substantial
risk factor for substance use and abuse
during adolescence. This finding suggests
that effective treatment of inattentive
symptoms, and preventing the development
of serious conduct problems, may be especially
important in reducing substance use problems
during adolescence.
It is important to put these findings within
an appropriate context. Although children
with ADHD were more likely than comparison
children to smoke, drink, and use other
illicit drugs as adolescents, most participants
did not report significant problems with
substance use. For example, even among adolescents
with persistent ADHD and Conduct Disorder
- the highest risk group - less than 30%
reported being drunk multiple times in the
prior 6 months or using illicit drugs other
than marijuana during the same period.
The authors note that relative to other
populations at risk for substance use problems,
the risks associated with childhood ADHD
are roughly comparable. As an example, they
suggest that ADHD in childhood appears to
be an equivalent risk factor for the development
of substance use problems as having a positive
family history of substance use disorder.
Why might inattentive ADHD symptoms be
such an important predictor of adolescent
substance use? The authors note that attention
problems are more strongly associated with
academic failure than hyperactive-impulsive
symptoms. They suggest that ongoing academic
struggles may lead children to drift away
from conventional peers oriented towards
academic success and toward nonconformist
peer groups where substance abuse is tolerated,
modeled, and encouraged. Although this theory
was not specifically tested, it highlights
the importance of carefully attending to
the academic success of students with ADHD
and making sure that an appropriate network
of educational supports are in place.
The authors also offer an interesting speculation
about the relationship between inattentive
symptoms and the substantially greater rates
of smoking. They note that nicotine has
psychostimulant properties that enhance
vigilance and attention, and suggest that
this may encourage earlier and heavier cigarette
use by adolescents as a method of "self-medication".
They reason improvements in cognitive functioning
that result from cigarette use may be rewarding
for individuals with ADHD, and that this
could explain their increased propensity
to become heavy smokers.
Overall, results from this study highlight
the importance of carefully attending to
early substance experimentation and use
among adolescents with ADHD. This is especially
true among children with prominent inattentive
symptoms and among those who develop the
serious behavior problems associated with
Conduct Disorder. Given the clear health
consequences of smoking, and the substantially
higher rates of smoking among adolescents
with a childhood history of ADHD, this may
warrant particular attention even though
cigarettes are not an illegal substance
at older ages.
There are several limitations of this study
that should be noted. First, participants
in this study were adolescents who had received
treatment at an ADHD specialty clinic during
childhood, and the extent to which these
results can be generalized to the wider
population of individuals with ADHD is not
known.
Second, the vast majority of participants
in this study were males, and testing gender
specific effects was thus not possible.
The extent to which the findings reported
would apply to girls specifically is thus
also unknown.
Finally, although results highlight that
ADHD symptoms - especially attention problems
- increase the risk for adolescent substance
use, the authors did not examine factors
that may have protected adolescents from
developing substance use problems. As noted
above, most participants with childhood
ADHD did not develop substance use problems,
and it would be helpful to know what factors
inhibited the development of such difficulties
in many of the participants.
One explanation is that those with less
severe symptoms were less likely to become
substance users. Even among participants
with more severe ADHD symptoms in childhood,
however, rates of adolescent substance use
were variable. What factors may have accounted
for this? Were any particular family factors
associated with reduced risk of later substance
use? Given that participants in this study
had all received some form of treatment,
how did treatment effectiveness related
to subsequent substance use? Were particular
treatment(s) more helpful than others in
reducing the risk of substance use in adolescence?
Clearly, additional research is needed to
shed more light on how various symptoms,
family factors and treatment interventions
reduce or increase the future use of substance
use.
|